On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 02:40:33PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
> Then you would better serve your agenda by contributing to that
> project than by lobbying for Mutt to bend in that direction. If
> you want to work on an SMTP-aware MUA, more power to you. But
> don't make Mutt users pay for something they won't use.

While I agree with the need to keep one's MUAs and MTAs seperate, I find your
argument flawed. There are literally dozens of features of Mutt that I don't
use. Does that mean I ought to object to development in those areas? I don't
think so.

If somebody wants SMTP support -- well he is free to maintain a patch to do
so... or if he is unable to do it himself, to lobby for somebody to do it.

Biju

-- 
-------------------------------------------------
Biju Chacko        | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)            
Exocore Consulting | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (play)
Bangalore, India   | http://www.exocore.com
-------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to