On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 02:40:33PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote: > Then you would better serve your agenda by contributing to that > project than by lobbying for Mutt to bend in that direction. If > you want to work on an SMTP-aware MUA, more power to you. But > don't make Mutt users pay for something they won't use. While I agree with the need to keep one's MUAs and MTAs seperate, I find your argument flawed. There are literally dozens of features of Mutt that I don't use. Does that mean I ought to object to development in those areas? I don't think so. If somebody wants SMTP support -- well he is free to maintain a patch to do so... or if he is unable to do it himself, to lobby for somebody to do it. Biju -- ------------------------------------------------- Biju Chacko | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Exocore Consulting | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (play) Bangalore, India | http://www.exocore.com -------------------------------------------------
- Re: request for SMTP integration (was Re: Mail usin... Andre Majorel
- Re: request for SMTP integration (was Re: Mail... Claus Assmann
- Re: request for SMTP integration (was Re: ... Rich Lafferty
- Re: request for SMTP integration (was Re: Mail... Brian Nelson
- Re: request for SMTP integration (was Re: ... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: request for SMTP integration (was Re: Mail... Biju Chacko
- Re: request for SMTP integration (was Re: ... Andre Majorel
- Re: request for SMTP integration (was Re: Mail... Claus Assmann
- Re: request for SMTP integration (was Re: ... Brian Nelson
- Re: request for SMTP integration (was Re: Mail... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: request for SMTP integration (was Re: Mail... Thomas Roessler
- Re: request for SMTP integration (was Re: ... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: request for SMTP integration (was Re: Mail... Thomas Roessler
- Re: request for SMTP integration (was Re: Mail... Lawrence Mitchell
- Re: request for SMTP integration (was Re: Mail... Matej Cepl
- Re: request for SMTP integration (was Re: Mail... Matej Cepl