* On [010511 22:45] Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2001-05-11 15:56:33 -0400, adam morley wrote:
>> I've just been told that > > is non-standard though. which means
>> we are distributing a software package that is non-standard. is
>> that bad?
> Is not _what_ standard? If we don't say "this is format=flowed", we
> also don't have to emit "format=flowed".
This "non-standard" refers to quoting levels, in conjunction with
format=flowed text, how to consider quoted text, and what defines the
quote depth, as far as I can make out.
The relevant RFC is; RFC 2646 section 4.5.
Though, from what I can make out from it, it doesn't apply when the
text format is not format=flowed.(?)
Lawrence
--
Lawrence Mitchell | http://members.tripod.co.uk/EVSvienna/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
