Hi Dave! On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Dave Pearson wrote: > > Obviously the best method of dealing with this is to implement a solution, Ack. But before reinventing something, it seems always advisible to check if there's alreay a solution. Finally, this can be accomplished by a discussing the problem here... > that's more constructive than a self-confessed "uppish tone". It would seem > you've decided to do that so I don't really see a problem or a need for such > a tone. On the other hand, meticulously insisting on an "It does what it says" point of view could be perceived as an "uppish tone", too. I would also like to see the discussed feature, so I'm thinking about my contribution to an appropriate solution. Regards, Axel
- Default mailbox display? Trae McCombs
- Re: Default mailbox display? Gary Johnson
- Re: Default mailbox display? Dave Pearson
- Re: Default mailbox display? Heinrich Langos
- Re: Default mailbox display? Dave Pearson
- Re: Default mailbox display? Heinrich Langos
- Re: Default mailbox display? Dave Pearson
- Re: Default mailbox display? Heinrich Langos
- Re: Default mailbox display? Dave Pearson
- Re: Default mailbox display? Axel Bichler
- Re: Default mailbox display? Dave Pearson
- Re: Default mailbox display?... Heinrich Langos
- Re: Default mailbox display?... Dave Pearson
- Reliably detecting/counting ... Heinrich Langos
- Re: Reliably detecting/count... Dave Pearson
- Re: Reliably detecting/count... Heinrich Langos
- Re: Reliably detecting/count... Dave Pearson
- Re: Default mailbox display? Daniel Freedman
- Re: Default mailbox display? David T-G
- Re: Default mailbox display? David Pippenger