Hi Dirk! On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Dirk Ruediger wrote: > > Mail/mutt-users [Msgs:413 New:18 1.1M] > > Mail/sf/vuln-dev [Msgs:141 478K] > > Mail/nymip [Msgs:54 368K] > > > > now wouldn't that be nice ? > > This implies that mutt scans all folders with new mail (at least with > mbox style folders)to determine the new-mail-count. This could be a huge > performance loss at start up. No, not necessarily. Mutt could save the filesizes. If the size has changed, new mail has arrived. Counting new mails could be pretty fast, if the program would skip the known part (old size) of the mbox file and parse the file from that point on. Regards, Axel
- Re: Default mailbox display? [... Heinrich Langos
- Re: Default mailbox display? [... Dave Pearson
- Reliably detecting/counting ne... Heinrich Langos
- Re: Reliably detecting/countin... Dave Pearson
- Re: Reliably detecting/countin... Heinrich Langos
- Re: Reliably detecting/countin... Dave Pearson
- Re: Default mailbox display? Daniel Freedman
- Re: Default mailbox display? David T-G
- Re: Default mailbox display? David Pippenger
- Re: Default mailbox display? Dirk Ruediger
- Re: Default mailbox display? Axel Bichler
- Re: Default mailbox display? Dave Pearson
- Re: Default mailbox display? Wilhelm Wienemann
- Re: Default mailbox display? Martin Schweizer
- Re: Default mailbox display? Heinrich Langos
- Re: Default mailbox display? Axel Bichler
- Re: Default mailbox display? Christoph Bugel
- Re: Default mailbox display? Pedro Melo