On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 11:12:37AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> [ifc-ml:####] Re: [ifc-ml:####] <base subject>
>
> ^^^^ ^^^^
> reply ID base message ID
>
> I hope that was clear.
>
> I think the only solution available to us is to change the internals of
> mutt to recognize this sort of mangled subject. Perhaps "we" could add
> a subject_ignore_regexp to tell mutt what part of a subject line to
> ignore when threading messages.
Is this necessary? I'm using:
set reply_regexp=
'^(\[[a-z0-9:-]+\][ \t]*)?(re([\[0-9\]+])*|aw):[\t]*'
and it's threading mailing lists of this type for me...
for example:
[ruby-talk:7097] Rubyize this method
[ruby-talk:7099] Re: Rubyize this method
[ruby-talk:7104] Re: Rubyize this method
are all threaded properly. (well, not as good as messages with
In-Reply-To: but better than having threads scattered all over the
folder)
perhaps the regex wasn't quite right?
--
Josh Huber | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
1024D/6B21489A 61F0 6138 BE7B FEBF A223 E9D1 BFE1 2065 6B21 489A
PGP signature
