Re: Why not include compressed folder support in official Mutt?

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

Roberto Suarez Soto proclaimed on mutt-users that: 

>       That's the question :-) I wonder why, if it's something that is
>obviously very useful, it's not included in the official distribution of Mutt
>:-? Any religious reason, or the like? :-m :-)

Just because it is a pain in the ass to use on incoming mail - and can
easily result in a corrupted mailbox.  gzip is best used to archive old
mails.

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian + [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pcquest.com/june00/linux_spam.asp