Thomas, et al --
...and then Thomas Roessler said...
% On 2000-04-19 14:57:10 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
%
% > If I remember the thread right, this request came about
% > partially because you can't do the "graft" function
% > when sending messages. Even if you use edit-headers and
% > include a correct References header, Mutt will remove
% > it before sending.
%
% Without checking this in the code, I seem to recall that
% adding an In-Reply-To header _plus_ a References header
% will make things work.
Ahhh... Hokay, then; you have to have the former in order to have the
latter (though maybe not the other way around, but what do I care).
I still say that it would be convenient to be able to point to a message
and pick up its references :-) but I can live with grabbing them from
other headers and creating the new headers myself. I guess I just make
IRT: be the ID of the message under which I want the modified message
attached, eh?
Off to play; thanks a bunch! :-)
%
% --
% http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bigfoot.com/~davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
The "new millennium" starts at the beginning of 2001. There was no year 0.
Note: If bigfoot.com gives you fits, try sector13.org in its place. *sigh*
PGP signature
