On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 06:13:16PM -0500, David T-G wrote: > Now that I can build because I have a working compiler (sorry for the > noise :-) I would like to look into my favorite feature patches. I use > patch-0.00.sec.patchlist.7 > patch-0.95.4.sec.expand_hook.1 [...] > Can the authors or maintainers of the patches let me know if any > of them are obsoleted or need to be updated, and where to get them? I will probably not be updating any patches soon, as I'm still using mutt-1.0, and I'm happy with it. CU, Sec -- Whatever the virtues of balance, it's just a pleasant form of insanity.
- File locking (was: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: File locking (was: Mutt 1.1.9 ... David DeSimone
- Re: File locking (was: Mutt 1.... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower than mutt 1.0 (was... Lars Hecking
- Re: Mutt 1.1.9 about 3-4x slower than mutt 1.0 (was... Clint Olsen
- Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE! David T-G
- Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE! David T-G
- Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDAT... Byrial Jensen
- Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDAT... Hans Bogaards
- My patches are updated to Mutt 1.2 Stefan `Sec` Zehl
- My patches are updated to Mutt 1.2 Byrial Jensen
- two mutt 1.1.9 problems(?) (was: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 i... Thomas Ribbrock
- Re: two mutt 1.1.9 problems(?) (was: [Announce] mut... Thomas Roessler