OK, somebody has to say this: Philip's latest revision of the procmailrc code in question is as follows: | :0 | * conditions | { | :0 r | foldername/tmp/$XXX | | :0 air | |mv foldername/tmp/$XXX foldername/new/$XXX | } Shouldn't the first recipe inside the braces have a `c' flag? And shouldn't there be some provision for fall-through? In fact, if we are going to do nothing about fall-through, do we need braces at all? :0rc * conditions foldername/tmp/$XXX :0air |mv foldername/tmp/$XXX foldername/new/$XXX # ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ # would $LASTFOLDER work there?
- Re: Introduction to Maildir (was Re: mutt and... Phil Staub
- Re: Introduction to Maildir (was Re: mutt and... Bennett Todd
- Re: Introduction to Maildir (was Re: mutt and... Mikko Hänninen
- Re: Introduction to Maildir (was Re: mutt and... Benjamin Korvemaker
- Re: Introduction to Maildir (was Re: mutt and... Aaron Schrab
- Re: Introduction to Maildir (was Re: mutt and... Benjamin Korvemaker
- Re: Introduction to Maildir (was Re: mutt and... Bennett Todd
- Re: Introduction to Maildir (was Re: mutt and... Philip Guenther
- Re: Introduction to Maildir (was Re: mutt and... Mikko Hänninen
- Re: Introduction to Maildir (was Re: mutt and... Philip Guenther
- Re: mutt and mh/procmail David W. Tamkin
- Re: mutt and mh/procmail Conrad Sabatier
- Re: mutt and mh/procmail Bennett Todd
- Re: mutt and mh/procmail Doug Wellington
- Re: mutt and mh/procmail Bennett Todd
- Re: mutt and mh/procmail Mikko Hänninen
- Re: mutt and mh/procmail Thomas Roessler
- Re: mutt and mh/procmail Conrad Sabatier
- Re: mutt and mh/procmail Mikko Hänninen
- Re: mutt and mh/procmail Bennett Todd
- Re: mutt and mh/procmail Bennett Todd