Jason Helfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 25 Feb 2000:
> This doesn't seem to be working....is this entered improperly?
It depends on what you're trying to do. You don't say, but I'm giving
it a guess below.
> folder-hook mutt "bind index r list-reply; bind pager r list-reply; bind attach r
>list-reply"
> folder-hook mutt "bind index r reply; bind index r reply; bind attach r reply"
> folder-hook clug "bind index r list-reply; bind pager r list-reply; bind attach r
>list-reply"
> folder-hook clug "bind index r reply; bind index r reply; bind attach r reply"
These 4 lines mean will have the end-result that for both folders mutt
and clug, r is bound to reply in the menus index and attach, and in
pager it is bound to list-reply.
You have two hooks for each folder. They get both executed, in order.
Therefore the second hook mostly un-does what the first does. The only
exception is that you're binding r to reply in index twice, which looks
like a mistake (you probably meant pager).
I'm *guessing* that this is what you want:
folder-hook . "bind index r reply; bind pager r reply; bind attach r reply"
folder-hook mutt "bind index r list-reply; bind pager r list-reply; bind attach r
list-reply"
folder-hook clug "bind index r list-reply; bind pager r list-reply; bind attach r
list-reply"
Ie. the default is to have r invoke the normal reply function in
index/pager/attach, but for the folders "mutt" and "clug" r will use
list-reply instead. The order is important, since the . will match
everything (including the mutt and clug folders), and all matching hooks
get invoked. Also note that the argument to folder-hook is a substring
match, so for example the folder "my-mutties" would also be matched by
the "mutt" regexp.
Hope this helps,
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
Reality is for people who can't cope with the Internet.
