Horacio MG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 12 Feb 2000:
> [yes] replies to the first address ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> [no] replies to the second address ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
My Mutt (1.1.3) behaves differently too. Pressing "r" and "y" will
reply to both addresses, "r" and "n" to just the iberia.es address.
I'm not sure, but could this be somehow related to your alternates
setting? By default, Mutt tries to avoid sending emails to your own
address(es), but that's dependent on $alternates... (Witness this by
going to your "sent mail" folder if you have one, and press "r" on any
message -- it will be directed to the *recipients*, not the sender,
which is you.)
> 1- is this allowed (conforming to whatever rfcs)?
It probably is, though I'm not sure. I've seen it a few times, even if
it seems to be rather rare.
> 2- will other mailers deal with it in a similar way?
I have no idea.
> 3- would it be possible to have both recipients (or more than 2)
> included in the To field when someone replies to my message?
Sure, if they are using Mutt, it should work that way (assuming they say
"yes" or otherwise configure Mutt to use Reply-To).
Regards,
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
Life would be much easier if I had the source code.
