2000-01-13-18:37:20 Matthew Hawkins:
> On 2000-01-13 12:54:07 -0500, Bennett Todd wrote:
> > But this isn't a limitation of the implementation, it's a limit of
> > the goal specified. Better not to go there.
>
> A limitation of the goal... that's a new one to me!
If you specify your goals as:
(1) You don't have a login on the mail server, and so can't
filter at delivery with procmail/maildrop/mailagent/...;
(2) You only access the email via POP or IMAP; and
(3) You don't want to download the email and keep it on the
client with e.g. fetchmail feeding procmail (perhaps via
local MTA);
then you have specified goals that can only be achieved via some
really revolting solution involving downloading the mail and
filtering it and then re-uploading it.
-Bennett
- New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Nick Jennings
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Jeremy Blosser
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Matthew Hawkins
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Mikko H�nninen
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Bennett Todd
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailb... Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: New Mail Sent to different ... Bennett Todd
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Matthew Hawkins
- Re: New Mail Sent to di... Bennett Todd
- Re: New Mail Sent to di... Mikko H�nninen
- Re: New Mail Sent to di... Bennett Todd
- Re: New Mail Sent to di... Brendan Cully
- Re: New Mail Sent to di... Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailb... Jeffrey L . Taylor
- Re: New Mail Sent to different ... Scott V. McGuire
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Bennett Todd
- Re: New Mail Sent to di... Scott V. McGuire
- Re: New Mail Sent to di... brian moore
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Charles Cazabon
PGP signature