2000-01-13-18:37:20 Matthew Hawkins: > On 2000-01-13 12:54:07 -0500, Bennett Todd wrote: > > But this isn't a limitation of the implementation, it's a limit of > > the goal specified. Better not to go there. > > A limitation of the goal... that's a new one to me! If you specify your goals as: (1) You don't have a login on the mail server, and so can't filter at delivery with procmail/maildrop/mailagent/...; (2) You only access the email via POP or IMAP; and (3) You don't want to download the email and keep it on the client with e.g. fetchmail feeding procmail (perhaps via local MTA); then you have specified goals that can only be achieved via some really revolting solution involving downloading the mail and filtering it and then re-uploading it. -Bennett
- New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Nick Jennings
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Jeremy Blosser
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Matthew Hawkins
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Mikko Hänninen
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailboxes Bennett Todd
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailb... Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: New Mail Sent to different ... Bennett Todd
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Matthew Hawkins
- Re: New Mail Sent to di... Bennett Todd
- Re: New Mail Sent to di... Mikko Hänninen
- Re: New Mail Sent to di... Bennett Todd
- Re: New Mail Sent to di... Brendan Cully
- Re: New Mail Sent to di... Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
- Re: New Mail Sent to different mailb... Jeffrey L . Taylor
- Re: New Mail Sent to different ... Scott V. McGuire
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Bennett Todd
- Re: New Mail Sent to di... Scott V. McGuire
- Re: New Mail Sent to di... brian moore
- Re: New Mail Sent to differ... Charles Cazabon