Roland Rosenfeld [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > No, thanks. _This_ can really be done at delivery time by procmail.
>
> Do you really want Mutt to be a geek only mail reader?
I do.
> Open your eyes, there are normal users out there, which don't want or
> aren't allowed/able to use procmail and which communicate with Windows
> users, which send out PGP without MIME headers but instead of this with
> vcards (multipart/mixed). If you want Mutt to become widely used,
The easier something gets to use for lusers, the more annoying it gets to
use for those of us that know what we are doing. I would much rather Mutt
stay discriminating.
What is the supposed benefit of "widely used" that it should become a Mutt
design goal? Does it have any intrinsic value other than ego?
--
Jeremy Blosser | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://jblosser.firinn.org/
-----------------+-------------------------+------------------------------
"If Microsoft can change and compete on quality, I've won." -- L. Torvalds
PGP signature
