Sorry, forgot the attachment (as usual).
--
Jeremy M. Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from localhost (root@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by imaxx.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA28450
for <jmd@localhost>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:05:19 -0500
Received: from mail.imaxx.net
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-4.7.9)
for jmd@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:05:19 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by mothra for know
(with Cubic Circle's cucipop (v1.21 1997/08/10) Wed Jun 30 12:04:59 1999)
X-From_: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 30 11:57:56 1999
Received: from null.cc.uic.edu ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [128.248.5.205])
by mothra.imaxx.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA12163
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 11:57:56 -0500
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by null.cc.uic.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA30887
for clug-list; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:46:50 -0500
Received: from bowe.ccm.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [206.54.246.6])
by null.cc.uic.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA30846
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:40:38 -0500
Received: from localhost (maney@localhost)
by bowe.ccm.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA20075
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:45:05 -0500 (CDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: bowe.ccm.net: maney owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:45:05 -0500 (CDT)
From: Martin Maney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [CLUG] Sub-$1k simple workstations
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: O
Content-Length:11267
Lines: 29
On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Diel Robert-W14725 wrote:
> Haven't been there, but have you tried ye old Computer Renassance. Also try
Unless this is a different operation with a similar name, don't bother.
Computer Rennaisance is pricey and, based on a scientifically inadequate
sample of one (oh, I wish he had asked me for help *before* pissing the
money away), not very good at fixing simple problems. When he finally
asked me to lok at it, after months and many trips (with a toll each time,
of course) to CR, it was something almost as trivial as setting the hard
drive's parameters correctly in the BIOS. That wasn't it exactly, but it
was about as close to rocket science as that.
Let me put it this way: I had told him, more than half in jest, that I'd
look at it and if I fixed it he should pay me half as much as CR had
charged him for not fixing it last time he took it in. After it was done,
I felt bad taking that much for healing it (but at that point he was
insisting, and I had to be firm to keep it at half their fee).
Hmmmm, I hadn't realized that I still needed to talk about that. Thanks,
doc. Nice restful couch you have here in my office. ;-)
---
ChicagoLand Linux Users Group: general discussion mailing list.
To unsubscribe mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body, "unsubscribe clug".
---
To recieve announcements only: subscribe to clug-announce by mailing to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with body, "subscribe clug-announce".
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 30 13:35:38 1999
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from localhost (root@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by imaxx.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA28485
for <jmd@localhost>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:35:37 -0500
Received: from mail.imaxx.net
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-4.7.9)
for jmd@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:35:37 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by mothra for know
(with Cubic Circle's cucipop (v1.21 1997/08/10) Wed Jun 30 12:35:15 1999)
X-From_: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 30 12:05:28 1999
Received: from smtp.itis.com (smtp.itis.com [209.83.0.138])
by mothra.imaxx.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA12500
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:05:27 -0500
Received: from lists.chorus.net (lists.chorus.net [209.83.0.30])
by smtp.itis.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Chorus Networks) with ESMTP id NAA06659;
Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:03:11 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by lists.chorus.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA05961
for linux-c-programming-outgoing; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:57:45 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from easyaccess.ieaccess.net ([204.143.227.11])
by lists.chorus.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA05957
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:57:39 -0500
(CDT)
Received: from cockroach ([204.143.227.114]) by easyaccess.ieaccess.net
(Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-58667U2500L250S0V35)
with ESMTP id net for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:50:49 -0400
Received: from nimennor by cockroach with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 10zNS1-0002N2-00; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:43:09 -0400
Subject: Status Display.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:43:09 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL48 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E10zNS1-0002N2-00@cockroach>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sergey Imennov)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sergey Imennov)
Status: O
Content-Length: 1513
Lines: 67
Hello all.
I'm working on a program, that is, upon user's
choice, produce a verbose output of a process; i.e.
how much is done, and how much is left.
I have seen programs using a bar such as these:
[............ ]
[........................ ]
to summarize the progress. (Unfortunately, none of
the program's source code is available, AFAIK)
Now, I have no problem printing the dots. :) The
problems creeps up when the number of operations to be
done are larger than one line's characters (usually,
80), and I want to use only *one* line for status.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Nikita.
P.s. Following is the source code, showing how little I
was able to accomplish.
------
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
void main(void)
{
unsigned int sampleSize = 800;
unsigned int sampleDone = 0;
unsigned int otherNumber = 0;
unsigned int count = 0;
sampleDone = sampleSize;
if(sampleSize < 80) {
printf("Small\n");
otherNumber = sampleSize + 1;
}
if(sampleSize % 80 != 1 && sampleSize > 80) {
printf("Multiple\n");
/* otherNumber = (sampleSize - 9) / 9;
otherNumber = 72;
*/
} else {
/* Primes, and numbers not evenly divisible by 80 */
}
while(sampleDone > 0) {
if(sampleDone % otherNumber) {
count++;
printf(".");
}
sampleDone--;
}
printf("\nOtherNumber = %d\n", otherNumber);
printf("Count = %d\n", count); /* How many dots we
have. */
}
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 30 13:35:39 1999
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from localhost (root@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by imaxx.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA28488
for <jmd@localhost>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:35:38 -0500
Received: from mail.imaxx.net
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-4.7.9)
for jmd@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:35:38 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by mothra for know
(with Cubic Circle's cucipop (v1.21 1997/08/10) Wed Jun 30 12:35:18 1999)
X-From_: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 30 12:21:28 1999
Received: from brimstone.netspace.org (brimstone.netspace.org [128.148.157.143])
by mothra.imaxx.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA13095;
Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:21:28 -0500
Received: from netspace.org ([128.148.157.6]:8714 "EHLO netspace.org" ident:
"TIMEDOUT2") by brimstone.netspace.org with ESMTP id <51619-10933>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999
13:51:15 -0400
Received: from NETSPACE.ORG by NETSPACE.ORG (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with
spool id 1792024 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:51:01
+0000
Approved-By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from customer.refract.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [206.170.13.5])
by netspace.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA25989 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:52:46 -0400
Received: from lappy (ppp-207-214-213-145.sntc01.pacbell.net [207.214.213.145])
by customer.refract.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id OAA23508; Mon, 28
Jun 1999 14:54:43 -0700
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Message-ID: <005e01bec1b0$8bc4fbe0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:52:34 -0700
Reply-To: "Nicholas W. Blasgen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Bugtraq List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Nicholas W. Blasgen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Outlook denial of service
X-To: YoDuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: O
Content-Length: 799
Lines: 24
I tested it with Outlook 2000 with Windows 98 and had no problem.
Nicholas Blasgen
Refract Media
"The hard part was figuring out how to destroy the
physical universe. But I think we've solved that."
- Marcus Larry, 1999
> I've found a problem in qualcomm popper (and presumabley others) in that
it
> doesn't check for an existing X-UIDL: headers, but simpley uses it when
the
> client sends in a uidl request. This problem can manifest itself as an
> effective denial of service attack against microsoft outlook clients
> because outlook looks for unique uidl's for each message and if there
are
> duplicates it will hang prior to downloading any mail. I've put up a
small
> web site detailing the problem and some possible work arounds/fixes at
>
> http://getaclue.org/yoduh/outlook.html
>
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 30 14:05:51 1999
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from localhost (root@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by imaxx.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA28692
for <jmd@localhost>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:05:50 -0500
Received: from mail.imaxx.net
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-4.7.9)
for jmd@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:05:50 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by mothra for know
(with Cubic Circle's cucipop (v1.21 1997/08/10) Wed Jun 30 13:05:29 1999)
X-From_: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 30 12:47:40 1999
Received: from brimstone.netspace.org (brimstone.netspace.org [128.148.157.143])
by mothra.imaxx.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA14077;
Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:47:39 -0500
Received: from netspace.org ([128.148.157.6]:8714 "EHLO netspace.org" ident:
"TIMEDOUT2") by brimstone.netspace.org with ESMTP id <44385-10931>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999
14:36:22 -0400
Received: from NETSPACE.ORG by NETSPACE.ORG (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with
spool id 1795304 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:36:01
+0000
Approved-By: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from underground.org (underground.org [209.179.181.153]) by
netspace.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id OAA03821 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:21:45 -0400
Received: (qmail 25944 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 1999 19:27:49 -0000
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<005e01bec1b0$8bc4fbe0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:27:49 -0700
Reply-To: Aleph One <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Bugtraq List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Aleph One <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Outlook denial of service
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <005e01bec1b0$8bc4fbe0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from Nicholas W.
Blasgen on Mon, Jun 28, 1999 at 02:52:34PM -0700
Status: O
Content-Length: 1032
Lines: 32
On Mon, Jun 28, 1999 at 02:52:34PM -0700, Nicholas W. Blasgen wrote:
> I tested it with Outlook 2000 with Windows 98 and had no problem.
>
> Nicholas Blasgen
> Refract Media
>
> "The hard part was figuring out how to destroy the
> physical universe. But I think we've solved that."
> - Marcus Larry, 1999
As Neil Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pointed out in private email
is this the fault of Outlook and not Qpopper. Here is what he
had to say:
The POP3 RFC suggests that duplicate UIDLs are acceptable for example
in the situation that there are two identical copies of 1 message in
a mailbox.
As such the fault is with Outlook etc in failing to handle this as
opposed to in qpopper for generating / allowing them.
Whether the POP server should accept incoming UIDL headers in the
message or always generate its own is another issue.
From ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1939.txt
--
Aleph One / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://underground.org/
KeyID 1024/948FD6B5
Fingerprint EE C9 E8 AA CB AF 09 61 8C 39 EA 47 A8 6A B8 01
