On 1999-12-02 15:35:35 +0000, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:

> The first <@> is in iso-8859-1, and the second <@> is in
> iso-8859-15. I observed that the @ in the second <@> was not
> converted ...

What's your local character set, what do you mean by "not
converted", and does your system have a character set definition
file for iso-8859-15?

-- 
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/

Reply via email to