* Sean Rima ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [991122 23:50]:
> Hi brian!
> 
> On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, brian moore wrote:

... [ Deletia ]

> > Then you know wrong.
> > 
> > GPG is quite content with PGP5 messages out of the box.  For PGP2 (ie,
> > RSA/IDEA), you can download and install the correct modules for GPG and
> > it will be glad to work with those.  (Though it will probably refuse to
> > accept some keys that are not self-signed, since PGP2 allowed creation
> > of such, but then such keys are not secure anyway, and people shouldn't
> > trust them.)
> > 
> 
> I have never got a PGP 5 sig to work with GPG. But then maybe it has
> something to do with the fact that they keys are no self signed.
> 
> Sean
> 

Please see my posting of 5 minutes ago to get RSA working.  You do
bring up a good point, though.  GPG will *not* use an unsigned key.

You'll see output like the following:

[-- PGP output follows (current time: Mon Nov 22 16:54:17 1999) --]
gpg: Signature made Wed Aug 11 11:36:48 1999 MDT using RSA key ID 98645519
gpg: requesting key 98645519 from pgp5.ai.mit.edu ...
gpg: public key is 43099 seconds newer than the signature
gpg: key 98645519: invalid self-signature
gpg: public key is 43476 seconds newer than the signature
gpg: key 98645519: invalid self-signature
gpg: key 98645519: no valid user IDs
gpg: this may be caused by a missing self-signature
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg:           w/o user IDs: 1
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
[-- End of PGP output --]

e.

P.S.
Jeremy, you should sign your key.  ;-)

-- 
Eric Brunson                * _ o  *       Faster and faster,             
[EMAIL PROTECTED]        * / //\           until the thrill of speed    
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                \>>|   *         overcomes the fear of death
[EMAIL PROTECTED]               \\,      

PGP signature

Reply via email to