> > Why not have one gpg (or pgp) config file for all correspondents?
> >
> The problem is the fact that there are a few people on the Mutt list who use
> PGP2 and PGP5. These keys are not able to be used in GPG AFAIK. I have both
> GPG and PGP to get around this but would like to be able to set Mutt to
> choice the correct encryption tool depending on who the message is from
This is the single biggest reason why I haven't switched over to
gpg yet. Problem is, there's bucketloads of information about
pgp/gpg interoperability, but I haven't found the time yet to
put all the pieces together. Maybe I should _really_ look at
Gero's scripts now ...
