Surely sendmail reeled when thusly spake Sven Guckes:
>
> > Elm always had a flag in the main display that told me a file had an
> > attachment, and when I viewed the message, there was a notice there too.
> > Mutt doesn't seem to do this, and I've missed attachments :-(
>
> Mutt once did this - but the flag was dropped. :-(
> I think this was done as you'd see the flag on
> almost all mails - even thought they'd only have
> just a single one which might just be text/plain.
Some attachment types are widespread, but just glorified Signature
files -- like vCards -- or auto-handled -- like PKI. Flagging them
would just add clutter.
Anything else is worth noting, though. (Except maybe those dopey
gif's). How about a config item to specify attachment types not
worth flagging ?
EEL fred
--
F.Baube(tm) * "Indeed, thanks to the PC, the Internet has a
G'town U. MSFS '88 * level of inconvenience that would be unaccept-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * able in any other mass-market medium."
+358 (40) 737 6934 * -- http://www.economist.com/editorial/
#include <std_disclaimer.h> * freeforall/current/sa0324.html