On Tue, Nov 16, 1999 at 06:09:17PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote: > Lalo Martins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Oh, one more tidbit: I _can_ save attachments. Go figure. > > That's because attachments are saved to *files*, while messages are > saved to *folders*. So attachments don't require any locking (unless > you're saving a message/rfc822 type, which is a message, but now it's > getting confusing). As a minor side issue: is there a way to save message to a *file* (i.e. without the locking)? Dotlocking does not work on FAT partitions... Best Regards, Marius Gedminas -- UNIX is user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are.
- fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Dan Lipofsky
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Lalo Martins
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Lalo Martins
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Mikko Hänninen
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Lalo Martins
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 3... David DeSimone
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errn... Thomas Roessler
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errn... Marius Gedminas
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (... David DeSimone
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Stephan Seitz
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Bill Nottingham
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Joshua Rodman
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Dirk Pirschel
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Roland Rosenfeld
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 3... Mikko Hänninen
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Roland Rosenfeld
- Re: fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37) Dan Lipofsky