Byrial Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 16 Oct 1999:
> However there is a problem here. If no messages were tagged then the
> tag-prefix will have no effect, and what happens to be the current
> message will then be expired.
True enough, forgot about that. :-( But there's no obvious work-around.
> It might be a good idea to solve such kind of problems by ignoring
> the command immediately after a tag-prefix command when there are no
> tagged messages when executing macros or push commands.
Indeed, but this might be a bit annoying for interactive use. I wonder
if it would be possible to do this in macros only?
I think the best solution would be to have a save-pattern function,
even if by default it would be unbound. But that's a great way to
add code bloat (?), because then there really should be a *-pattern
command for almost every message handling function.
> BTW. The tag-prefix ";" should be escaped with a backslash
Right.
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
Don't take life too seriously, it's only temporary.
