On 1999-08-09 15:22:07 -0700, rex wrote:
>> - When your mail user agent doesn't support PGP, it has no decent
>> access to the signed text. Not very nice.
> But I don't understand this. The signature is just part of the
> message and doesn't interfere with reading the signed part of the
> message at all, IME.
Try sending unified diffs with traditional PGP signatures. Try
reading such messages with a MUA different from Mutt.
>> Nothing. That's why Mutt is actually able to _receive_
>> traditional-style PGP signed message, but sends PGP signed messages
>> in a format which complies with RFC 2015, a Proposed Internet
>> Standard.
> After procmail is used to fix up the message, yes.
Yes, certainly. There is no standard which specifies that
text/plain should be scanned for PGP messages. ;-)
