Josh Hildebrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> David, I believe I see what you are saying; however, your suspicion
> appears to be wrong, in this case.

This is not just a suspicion.  I actually tested this out using Mutt
0.95.1.  You appear to be using Mutt 0.93.2.  Is there a difference in
how these two versions work?

> > I have tried constructing a
> > MIME message with X-uuencode encoding method by hand.  If I make the
> > filename in the MIME headers different from the one in the encoded body
> > (on the "begin" line), the one in the headers is chosen every time.  If
> > I put a space in the filename in the headers, the space is honored.

If you "bounce" me a copy of one of your Notes messages (not the list,
please!), we can see if my version of Mutt works differently with the
document.

-- 
David DeSimone   | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  that there is no man really clever who has not
Hewlett-Packard  |  found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson
Convex Division  |    PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D  AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44

Reply via email to