Hi, folks --
...and then Mary Ellen Foster said...
% Thus spake Ian Peters...
% > On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 08:17:51PM -0500, Ian Peters wrote:
% > > The list-reply function, normally bound to L?
% >
% > I should probably mention the lists command, as well.
% [...]
% > When I am reading mail from mutt-users, then, and hit L, it replies to
% > mutt-users instead of the sender.
%
% Here's a question: is there some way to get the "list-reply" functionality
% without some of the other side effects of defining a mailing list?
I don't know if mutt-users is [double-]secretly defined as a list, but
I have no "lists" definition in my .muttrc that might be causing this
behavior: I use 'g'roup reply to catch all of the addresses, so that I
can put the original poster on the Cc: line but send it To: mutt-users,
and more often than not I only get mutt-users (ie no individual).
That's confusing to me, but it does, at least, provide a means by
which one can get the mutt-users (or, presumably, other list) address
on the To: line...
HTH and wondering why it only goes "all the way" sometimes,
:-D
--
David Thorburn-Gundlach * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Helping out at Pfizer
http://www.poboxes.com/davidtg/
Note: If poboxes.com gives you fits, try sector13.org in its place. *sigh*
PGP signature
