Thus spake Ian Peters...
> On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 08:17:51PM -0500, Ian Peters wrote:
> > The list-reply function, normally bound to L?
> 
> I should probably mention the lists command, as well.
[...]
> When I am reading mail from mutt-users, then, and hit L, it replies to
> mutt-users instead of the sender.

Here's a question: is there some way to get the "list-reply" functionality
without some of the other side effects of defining a mailing list?

Specifically, when you add a list to "lists", messages to that list show up
as "To List Name" instead of "From Whoever" in the index. Since I procmail
most of the lists I'm subscribed to into different folders, I don't want
the sender's name to be obscured; I know by the folder I'm in which list
the message was sent to.

Thanks,

MEF

-- 
Mary Ellen Foster, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]           Web: http://www.cs.utoronto.ca/~mef/
--------------------- Law of Software Envelopment: --------------------- 
        Every program attempts to expand until it can read mail. 

Reply via email to