On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 10:43:00PM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote in > <20230307_213502_4a7zc...@breakpoint.cc>: > > The default message-id uses a timestamp and a few random bytes encoded > > as base64 (with safe URL dictionary) as the user part. This is fine > > already. > > It would be beneficial for the human parser to have the timestamp > > encoded as a date string so that the date can be easily recognised as > > part of the message id.
> Oh how much i agree with that! That ML-archive randomization is > a pain in the a.se imho. > Yet -- isn't this about the format that mutt had before a very > long thread some years ago? I agree about changing it back, and yes, that's my memory too, that there was a very long and heated thread about it. w
