Eric Wong <e...@80x24.org> wrote: > > - fmt = "<%z@%f>"; > > + fmt = "<%Y%02m%02d_%02H%02M%02S_%r%r@%f>"; > > Kinda shocked that the %02's are necessary for a user-facing > config file, but yes, it's a much more reasonable default with > this patch so users won't have to deal with it :>
I was so shocked by the %02's that I didn't notice the underscores. It's probably a minor issue, though... I don't think the first one is necessary since it can break existing prefix scans using `grep ^YYYYmmddHH', SQL SELECTs. The second `_' might look better as a `.' just because that's what users have grown accustomed to from old mutt :>
