On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 11:48:38AM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 12:48:03PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 05:27:32PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > > Can you provide a minimal reproduce of the problem? > > > > I sure can: > > > > set spoolfile = Path/to/coninued/header/message/folder > > color normal default default > > color header brightgreen default . > > color header brightmagenta default ^(subject|from|to|cc|date) > > > > With these, the specified headers will all be magenta. That is, > > unless they are continued--then they will be green. > > I can reproduce this with versions 1.10.1 and 1.11.4, and so I don't believe > this is a regression.
Turns out I have 1.9.4 lying around and I can repro it there as well. > When the header wraps, the second color line above will match the wrapped > line, and will then override the third color lines' match of the > first header line. OK but do you agree that behavior is wrong? :) It's one header, regardless of the wrapping... > I think instead you probably want: > > color normal default default > color hdrdefault brightgreen default > color header brightmagenta default ^(subject|from|to|cc|date) That does seem to work... I wasn't familiar with that keyword. Even after 25 years, I don't know all the keywords. Just supports my theory that Mutt has too many, IMO. =8^) At any rate, given my way has parity with configuring hooks and such, and is (IMO) the intuitive behavior, I think the two versions of config ought to work identically. YMMV. > > On a separate note, I tried to compile 2.1.5 with the sidebar enabled, > > and I got this mess (which I made no effort to investigate, but I can > > later, theoretically, if you like), just FYI: > > I can't reproduce this from a fresh unpacked tarball. [...] > Try a make clean; make and see if that fixes the problem? It did! I should have tried that outright, but... too many pots on the stove. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
