On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 08:50:27PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 02:34:57PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote: > Fixing this almost certainly won't fix Matthias' problem, but may at > least help make it clear why it's happening. There's also a bit of > trickiness in what to do about some of the cases... But in this > instance, basically Mutt should report to the user that the process > was killed by a signal, what the signal was, and indicate that it > can't know if sending the message was actually successful.
Sorry, I confused myself here. :) It's true that the current implementation can't detect children killed by signals, but that's not what's going on in this case. AFAICT, NO process is actually killed by a signal. The issue was that Mutt got tired of waiting for sendmail and exited. But it has not provided itself a way to know or report that, either. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
