> -----Original message----- > From: "Kevin J. McCarthy" <ke...@8t8.us> > Sent: 18 Sep 2020, 09:27 > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:41:36AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > Just today on IRC, skered asked about being able to "always reply to > > text/plain but always view text/html". This might be possible with > > macros covering all the display/move-display functions but would be much > > simpler with a display-hook that only covers the actual > > 'mutt-display-message()'. > > > > What do others think about this? > > Just to follow up, skered was able to find a good solution for his problem > using Mutt variables. > > After thinking about it a few days, I don't know that there is a clever > solution for your problem, but I still lean towards not adding this. I > don't think it's generally useful.
thanks for your answer. It is unfortunate for me, but I understand your position. (I was maintaining Haskell data structures like Data.Map for a while, and keeping API versatile but not bloated is a challenge.) But if you find some more users of a display_hook in a future, I am still interested in seeing it added :-) Or if you want to add a function to just peek at new mail, i.e., not marking it as read automatically, I would also be a user. Thanks, cheers, Milan Straka PS: It seems "consider mail completed when watched" is a predominant approach; personally, many mails seem to include smaller or larger tasks, so "only consider mail completed after manually marked" seems like a reasonable alternative.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
