On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 01:39:21AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2020-06-20 08:48:04 +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:On 19Jun2020 07:11, Kevin J. McCarthy <ke...@8t8.us> wrote:Would it make more sense to just say "Warning: clearing unexpected buffered data after STARTTLS"?"Warning: after STARTTLS: clearing unexpected buffered data" ?
Thanks Cameron!I think the context: context: message is logical, but since we don't use it elsewhere might be confusing.
"Warning: clearing unexpected server data before TLS negotiation"
I like this one. It's clear, and avoids "buffered" which I agree is an unnecessary technical term.
-- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
