On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 09:13:34PM -0500, Derek wrote in
<20200419021334.go19...@bladeshadow.org>:
OK I'm getting pretty bored with this, it's already been decided by
Kevin it won't be accepted, but I'll answer this last message since it
attempts to directly address a challenge I made.
Your initial response to my patch was in GB19544 from 19:59 on Friday.
Then you moved on to do some other things and sent some other emails (on
what and where I do not know, but I am reasonably confident there were two
of them) before returning to this thread at 02:40 Friday on Saturday night
in message GE19544. No further emails were sent by you till 12:04 on
Saturday when you returned to this thread by message GF19544 -- I hope you
slept well.
And then:
GG19544 12:17
GH19544 12:17
GI19544 12:26
GJ19544 12:33
GK19544 13:12
GL19544 13:23
GM19544 18:23 (Did you go out to shop, or did you work a bit in the
garden?)
GN19544 18:34
GO19544 21:13
So, bored as you might be with the subject, it does seem like you had
little else to do yesterday anyways other than sleeping in and spending
the afternoon doing who knows what.
Even when my conclusions based on your email patterns are wrong (they very
well might be), I do think some of my observations looking at just your
message ID's may have been spot on or close enough to be uncomfortable.
Even if this were not the case, can you imagine other people would be
uncomfortable about such observations being made on their email behaviour?
And when they are confronted with a more observant, skilled, and obsessed
person than me?
This is not about people doing shady things. It is about people divulging
information about themselves (unknowingly) that they'd rather not divulge
given the choice.
Cheers,
Remco
