This seems like a good idea, and I'm a bit surprised no one has noticed it before.
Perhaps the "expected" behavior is putting '--' before the %s, but neither the sample mailcap or manual mention that. So I would think it's a good idea to add the protection to mutt instead.
Is this an oversight, or am I missing something? Thanks, -- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature