On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 07:12:58PM +0200, ilf wrote:
> Kevin J. McCarthy:
> >>GPGME 1.8.0 has been released two years ago. I think it's very
> >>reasonable to have a future Mutt release to require that
> >>version.
> >One of my best testers, @chsiza on gitlab, runs on a Mac and
> >regularly tests the latest commits.  Mac's ports libraries are
> >notoriously out of date.
> 
> I don't know much about macOS, but there is gpgme 1.13.0 in
> Homebrew: https://formulae.brew.sh/formula/gpgme
> 
> Do we really need to still support gpgme 1.4.0 from 2013?

Ubuntu LTS has:

libgpgme11/xenial,now 1.6.0-1 amd64 [installed]
  GPGME - GnuPG Made Easy (library)

libgpgme11-dev/xenial 1.6.0-1 amd64
  GPGME - GnuPG Made Easy (development files)

So, it's probably at least reasonable to do so...  Is there some reason it
should not be supported?

-- 
Derek D. Martin    http://www.pizzashack.org/   GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02
-=-=-=-=-
This message is posted from an invalid address.  Replying to it will result in
undeliverable mail due to spam prevention.  Sorry for the inconvenience.

Attachment: pgps4IQWMDA9X.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to