On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:00:08AM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 03:08:34PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 07:21:15AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > > I'll post a patch for this (based on your patch) later on today, so you > > > can see more concretely what I'm proposing. > > > > I need to clean up and test these more, but just to show concretely what > > I'm proposing, here are two patches. > > So far I've only scanned them very quickly, but this seems pretty > reasonable. :) I'll probably hold off on doing any testing myself > until you're finished with your cleanup, mainly because I'm a little > busy...
I'm going to push the two patches up. I think they are the right thing to do, and the beginning of the development cycle is the best time for aggressive changes like this. Please everyone, don't be shy to let me know if you think this is a stupid change. I'll be happy to consider other proposals or even back it out if necessary. -- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
