Hi,

I was mainly referring to your patch that prevents mutt from hanging.
I'll try to test your other patch in a couple weeks.

Thanks!

Yoshiki.

On (May-11-15| 2:05), egbert. wrote:
> Hi Yoshiki and all,
> 
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:22:15AM -0700, Yoshiki Vazquez-Baeza wrote:
> > Hi,                                                                         
> >     
> >                                                                             
> >     
> > I would be very interested in testing your patch (I don't have enough
> > experience with the code-base to review it).
> 
> I’m not sure now if you mean the new mail patch or the hanging socket one.  
> 
> Well for what it’s worth, here is (yet another) new mail patch, which I am 
> using at home. It’s based off of c46dfbdb5eff from last week. I know you and 
> David are working on this and I don’t want to step on any toes … but maybe 
> my version is useful to you or someone else!
> 
> For reference I’m also enclosing my ‘new-mail’ command, which plays a sound, 
> pops up a notification through zenity, and tells mutt to emit a terminal 
> beep, and never notifies twice for the same message.
> 
> Cheers, Allen
> 
> > The patch that Kevin mentioned can be found in this thread:
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.mutt.devel/21880/focus=21890
> > 
> > Thanks!
> >                                                                             
> >     
> > Yoshiki.
> > 
> > On (Apr-23-15| 7:52), Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> > > egbert. wrote:
> > > > There was an irritating glitch, which I have also seen mentioned a few 
> > > > times 
> > > > online. It is that if you have mutt open, pack up your laptop, and go 
> > > > somewhere else, mutt is completely unresponsive and needs to be killed. 
> > > > I 
> > > > tracked down what was causing this and to my satisfaction my fix works. 
> > > > 
> > > > Would you be interested in this patch? And, if the intended behaviour 
> > > > is 
> > > > that it should hang like this, then perhaps my fix could be implemented 
> > > > as a 
> > > > config variable. (It’s basically just a simple timeout + retry 
> > > > mechanism in 
> > > > the socket_connect function).
> > > 
> > > Please go ahead and post your patch, either to this list, or perhaps to
> > > a ticket.  It looks like http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3369 or
> > > http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3491 might be related.
> > > 
> > > Most of the committers are quite busy right now, so it may take a while
> > > to get a response.
> > > 
> > > > Also, you’ve probably talked about this many times before, but is there 
> > > > a 
> > > > reason not to implement a config option to call a command when there is 
> > > > new 
> > > > mail? 
> > > 
> > > Yoshiki Vazquez Baeza posted a patch for this a couple months ago, and
> > > David Champion is incorporating it into a related patch set.
> > > 
> > > -Kevin
> > 
> > 
> 





Reply via email to