Hi, I would be very interested in testing your patch (I don't have enough experience with the code-base to review it). The patch that Kevin mentioned can be found in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.mutt.devel/21880/focus=21890
Thanks! Yoshiki. On (Apr-23-15| 7:52), Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > egbert. wrote: > > There was an irritating glitch, which I have also seen mentioned a few > > times > > online. It is that if you have mutt open, pack up your laptop, and go > > somewhere else, mutt is completely unresponsive and needs to be killed. I > > tracked down what was causing this and to my satisfaction my fix works. > > > > Would you be interested in this patch? And, if the intended behaviour is > > that it should hang like this, then perhaps my fix could be implemented as > > a > > config variable. (It’s basically just a simple timeout + retry mechanism in > > the socket_connect function). > > Please go ahead and post your patch, either to this list, or perhaps to > a ticket. It looks like http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3369 or > http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3491 might be related. > > Most of the committers are quite busy right now, so it may take a while > to get a response. > > > Also, you’ve probably talked about this many times before, but is there a > > reason not to implement a config option to call a command when there is new > > mail? > > Yoshiki Vazquez Baeza posted a patch for this a couple months ago, and > David Champion is incorporating it into a related patch set. > > -Kevin