Hi,                                                                             
                                                                                
I would be very interested in testing your patch (I don't have enough
experience with the code-base to review it).
                                                                                
The patch that Kevin mentioned can be found in this thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.mutt.devel/21880/focus=21890

Thanks!
                                                                                
Yoshiki.

On (Apr-23-15| 7:52), Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> egbert. wrote:
> > There was an irritating glitch, which I have also seen mentioned a few 
> > times 
> > online. It is that if you have mutt open, pack up your laptop, and go 
> > somewhere else, mutt is completely unresponsive and needs to be killed. I 
> > tracked down what was causing this and to my satisfaction my fix works. 
> > 
> > Would you be interested in this patch? And, if the intended behaviour is 
> > that it should hang like this, then perhaps my fix could be implemented as 
> > a 
> > config variable. (It’s basically just a simple timeout + retry mechanism in 
> > the socket_connect function).
> 
> Please go ahead and post your patch, either to this list, or perhaps to
> a ticket.  It looks like http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3369 or
> http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3491 might be related.
> 
> Most of the committers are quite busy right now, so it may take a while
> to get a response.
> 
> > Also, you’ve probably talked about this many times before, but is there a 
> > reason not to implement a config option to call a command when there is new 
> > mail? 
> 
> Yoshiki Vazquez Baeza posted a patch for this a couple months ago, and
> David Champion is incorporating it into a related patch set.
> 
> -Kevin


Reply via email to