(resending from the subscribed address)
On 2013-10-03, at 01:12 +0200, Thomas Roessler <roess...@gmail.com> wrote: > So, who's volunteering to do the release engineering for that? > > (I agree that it's time to ship *a* stable version; not sure whether it's > worthwhile at least going through the assorted packages and ports and > figuring out what the commonly shipped patches are these days.) > > Thomas Roessler (@roessler) > > > > > > > > > On 2013-10-02, at 19:05 +0200, Will Yardley <mutt-...@veggiechinese.net> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:12:14PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: >>> >>> The 1.6 release is supposedly waiting on some of those... >>> and has been for a very long time now. >> >> And honestly, given the number of vendors who are distributing 1.5.x, >> and the number of users who are using it, I think 1.6 should just be >> released. It seems like if "we" wait for it to be perfect, it will never >> be released. >> >> w >> >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
