On 2007-09-05 11:40:41 -0700, Brendan Cully wrote: > yes, I agree very much with this. That's why the emacs input > method seems more suitable - mutt's input line is a lot like the > emacs minibuffer.
+1 -- Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 2007-09-05 11:40:41 -0700, Brendan Cully wrote: > yes, I agree very much with this. That's why the emacs input > method seems more suitable - mutt's input line is a lot like the > emacs minibuffer.
+1 -- Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>