> I strongly agree with this too. In hindsight, the emacs technique of
> growing the input line as necessary seems like the obvious way to go.

This would be my preference stylistically, but my greater concern is
bandwidth.  I still find myself working over low-throughput connections
more often than I'd like, and I think I would gravitate toward whatever
uses the fewest bytes.

-- 
 -D.    [EMAIL PROTECTED]    NSIT    University of Chicago

Reply via email to