On 2007-02-27 15:53:14 +0100, Michael Tatge wrote: > * On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 Vincent Lefevre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > > The pattern ~X (e.g. ~X1-9) doesn't seem to work any longer, or said > > otherwise, all the messages are considered as having no attachments > > (~X0 selects all the messages). > > Works, here. Did you add the necessary config, i.e. attachments > statements?
Hmm... No. This should probably said in the manual under the Patterns section. Now I wonder why Mutt doesn't have some (useful) defaults, that would be applied when no attachments statements have been given. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
