-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Rick Hansen schrieb:
> Moby has a good point. Rather than enriching attorneys, it would be better
> to find a solution that provides non-monetary benefits to all, such as
> improvements to Lame, etc.

I don't think that Sony has any significant improvements to Lame but...
Sony is already licensee of the MP3 patent... What if we "force" Sony to
sub license Lame so that we finally would have legal license for MP3
encoding? This would be a real benefit for all of us!

Something like everyone interested can mail Sony and gets an
approvement, Sony itself will then pay the encoder license share to the
MPEG consortium.

> R.
Cheers
  nils faerber

- --
kernel concepts          Tel: +49-271-771091-12
Dreisbachstr. 24         Fax: +49-271-771091-19
D-57250 Netphen          Mob: +49-176-21024535
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDf0J8JXeIURG1qHgRAu34AJ9XZkWdQeB6JrGd2NmLTxXWKWFcdQCff0nb
bRRnvShoSITVbsW5CXNdkxI=
=c9Jd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
mp3encoder mailing list
[email protected]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder

Reply via email to