Well, that makes AAC far less attractive in my eyes then... That's why I
started using OGG back in the RC1 days, the gapless playback (and the fact
that a decompressed OGG file has the exact same size and length as the
original uncompressed source, which was far from the case with MP3). But
still, if AAC proves to kick a**, it'll be worth taking the extra time to
sort my song collection into those that need gapless encoding and those that
don't.



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Menno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'MP3 encoders development list'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 4:08 PM
Subject: RE: [mp3encoder] OT: AAC encoder, where and which?


> > I read a little on the link you mailed - do you know if an
> > ISO compliant AAC file supports gapless encoding/playback
> > unlike ISO compliant MP3?
>
> Well, that's not defined in the standard, but it is possible, with some
> extra metadata.
>
> Menno
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mp3encoder mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder

_______________________________________________
mp3encoder mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder

Reply via email to