|
>One of the biggest differences
between l3psycho_anal_ns and
>l3psyco_anal is exactly what you are asking about - how the estimate >the tonality index. One is a tweaked and cleaned up version of the >MPEG1/2 recommendation: the predictiictability of the energy in each >band over several granules. I believe it comes from thesis work >of one of the creators of MP3. The other is based on how peaked the >spectrum is, and uses data just from a single granule. Naoki wrote >it based on data in Zweicker's book. Zweicker's book?? would you tell me the name of the book
or more information
about
the l3psycho_anal_ns
>Keep in mind that all the models are very crude estimates, >and the output should be considered as a rough guide to the noise >shaping algorthims rather than absolute truth. >Mark |
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MS Stereo Mark Taylor
- [MP3 ENCODER] MS stereo reinhard
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MS stereo Bob Cain
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MS stereo Ivan Dimkovic
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MS stereo reinhard
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MS stereo reinhard
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MS stereo Mark Taylor
- [MP3 ENCODER] MS Stereo Hann Long Kwan
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MS Stereo Ivan Dimkovic
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MS Stereo Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MS Stereo reinhard
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MS Stereo Gabriel Bouvigne
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MS Stereo shibatch
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MS Stereo Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MS Stereo Naoki Shibata
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MS Stereo Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MS Stereo Ivan Dimkovic
- [MP3 ENCODER] MS Stereo Hann Long Kwan
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] MS Stereo Ivan Dimkovic
