Well does it or dosen't it!
Chuck Simmons wrote:
> Adam Bailey wrote:
>
>>Peter Lairo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>Adam Bailey wrote:
>>>
>>>>bpj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Does Mozilla support Return Receipts?
>>>>>
>>>>Return receipts are largely useless over the Internet. Don't waste your time
>>>>with them.
>>>>
>>>Why useless, most people that matter that I have requested one from have
>>>sent it. Thus giving me documentation that an important mail was
>>>received. This can be very important in business commiunications.
>>>
>>A receipt doesn't mean anything. It's not a guarantee of anything.
>>
>>
>>>I know, it is not likely to be 100% legally binding, but it can be the
>>>straw that tilts things way over in your favor.
>>>
>>They're not 0.1% legally binding.
>>
>>--
>>Adam Bailey | Chicago, Illinois
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Finger/Web for PGP
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.lull.org/adam/
>>
>
> And most accurately, it is a curious fact that the negative ack of no
> bounce is far more reliable than a receipt.
>
> Chuck
>
