Adam Bailey wrote:
>
> Peter Lairo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Adam Bailey wrote:
> >> bpj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Does Mozilla support Return Receipts?
> >>
> >> Return receipts are largely useless over the Internet. Don't waste your time
> >> with them.
> >
> > Why useless, most people that matter that I have requested one from have
> > sent it. Thus giving me documentation that an important mail was
> > received. This can be very important in business commiunications.
>
> A receipt doesn't mean anything. It's not a guarantee of anything.
>
> > I know, it is not likely to be 100% legally binding, but it can be the
> > straw that tilts things way over in your favor.
>
> They're not 0.1% legally binding.
>
> --
> Adam Bailey | Chicago, Illinois
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Finger/Web for PGP
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.lull.org/adam/
And most accurately, it is a curious fact that the negative ack of no
bounce is far more reliable than a receipt.
Chuck
--
... The times have been,
That, when the brains were out,
the man would die. ... Macbeth
Chuck Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
