It sucks that javadoc can influence generated code. You'd think there would be a language keyword for that.
-----Original Message----- From: monodroid-boun...@lists.ximian.com [mailto:monodroid-boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Pryor Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 2:46 PM To: Dimitar Dobrev Cc: monodroid@lists.ximian.com Subject: Re: [mono-android] Missing Android.Resource.Styleable On Mar 13, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Dimitar Dobrev <dpldob...@yahoo.com> wrote: > OK, this makes sense. So, is it then some kind of a bug in the Android > SDK? I don't see a reason for the android.jar on the device (or on the > emulator in my case) to be different. This is not a bug in the Android SDK. If you read the Android source much, you will see the @hide javadoc-comment tag. This does (at least) two things: 1. It removes the type/member from the generated JavaDoc HTML output. 2. It will cause the type/member to be removed from the android.jar that is in the Android SDK. This prevents developers from "accidentally" referencing implementation details. This is not an Android SDK bug, it's a feature. - Jon _______________________________________________ Monodroid mailing list Monodroid@lists.ximian.com UNSUBSCRIBE INFORMATION: http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodroid _______________________________________________ Monodroid mailing list Monodroid@lists.ximian.com UNSUBSCRIBE INFORMATION: http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodroid
