I was going to suggest that me getting first-come on the main module was a PAUSE error at some point, but since I never did any releases, perhaps someone's finger slipped in the PAUSE web interface when handing off permissions for something else?
Fixing all the permission so Dave is f and I am c would make the most sense, and that is what I expected it would have been already :) I've pushed the button at pause.perl.org: - Made DROLSKY primary maintainer of MooseX::ClassAttribute. - Made DROLSKY primary maintainer of MooseX::ClassAttribute::Meta::Role::Attribute. - Made DROLSKY primary maintainer of MooseX::ClassAttribute::Trait::Application::ToClass. - Made DROLSKY primary maintainer of MooseX::ClassAttribute::Trait::Attribute. - Made DROLSKY primary maintainer of MooseX::ClassAttribute::Trait::Class. - Made DROLSKY primary maintainer of MooseX::ClassAttribute::Trait::Role. Thanks Neil! On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 2:13 PM Dave Rolsky <auta...@urth.org> wrote: > I created this long ago but I guess Karen must've done a release that > added a new package. I think it'd make the most sense to give me primary on > everything. That said, I'm not using this any more so I'd be happy to give > Karen primary if she wants it ;) > > > Cheers, > > Dave Rolsky > http://blog.urth.org > https://github.com/autarch > > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 4:07 PM Neil Bowers <neil.bow...@cogendo.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Karen & Dave, >> >> I’m emailing you wearing my PAUSE admin hat; I’m sorting out situations >> where CPAN distributions have split ownership, as it can result in parts of >> releases not getting indexed, and then when transferring permissions, >> modules get missed. PAUSE tries to not let this happen now, but there are >> some historical cases, which I’m working through. MooseX-ClassAttribute is >> one such. >> >> You both have first-come on some of the packages in the dist; Karen has >> first-come on the lead module MooseX::ClassAttribute, but Dave seems to >> have done all releases of the dist. So I’m guessing the module was >> originally part of the Moose distribution, and then split out? >> >> Given Dave seems to be maintaining the dist, does it make sense to give >> him all the first-comes? >> >> If so, I’ll make the changes for you, though you’re welcome to, of course >> :-) >> >> Cheers, >> Neil >> >
