Matt,
So I was thinking, why would it complain about a non-existent
permissions error if it had no idea what the module name was
supposed to be in the first place?
It knows the dist name. To upload Date-Easy as a dist name requires perms
on Date::Easy.
Then the empty provides means it didn't index Date/Easy.pm so you never got
the first-come perms generated so the dist was marked disallowed so it told
you about that.
Okay, that makes sense.
But perhaps it's all connected, as you surmise.
There is no perhaps involved. Neil knows what he's talking about.
Please try to be less condescending to volunteers trying to help you by
telling you your exact mistake.
Ummm ... maybe please try to be less condescending to people you assume
are being condescending without any real proof. ;-> All I did was refer
to this statement of Neil's:
I *think* that the problem is ...
as "surmising." I don't see any condescension there. However, if Neil
does, I hope he will let me know and I'll be pleased to apologize for
any lack of clarity on my part which may have caused the misunderstanding.
-- Buddy
