On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 08:31:14PM -0700, Buddy Burden wrote: > So I was thinking, why would it complain about a non-existent > permissions error if it had no idea what the module name was > supposed to be in the first place?
It knows the dist name. To upload Date-Easy as a dist name requires perms on Date::Easy. Then the empty provides means it didn't index Date/Easy.pm so you never got the first-come perms generated so the dist was marked disallowed so it told you about that. > But perhaps it's all connected, as you surmise. There is no perhaps involved. Neil knows what he's talking about. Please try to be less condescending to volunteers trying to help you by telling you your exact mistake. -- Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit and a clue http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/ http://twitter.com/shadowcat_mst/ Email me now on mst (at) shadowcat.co.uk and let's chat about how our CPAN commercial support, training and consultancy packages could help your team.
