On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Matt S Trout <m...@shadowcat.co.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:48:02AM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote: >> CPAN search also looks in module abstracts. > > That doesn't mean you shouldn't try and pick a good name.
What makes you believe I did not try? >> > A better name would be Protocol::WL, since that namespace is already in use >> > on PAUSE. >> >> See the module submission mail for discussion on the naming. > > WL is absolutely meaningless on first sight as a namespace. Expanding the > acronym or adding a qualifier for what area it related to would be good. > > WL as a namespace on its own is terrible. Do you have a better suggestion?
